Short notice periods are better for employees if: * Transition is expensive for employer (handover, finding replacements) but cheap for the employee (moving co

Short notice periods are better for employees if: * Transition is expensive for employer (handover, finding replacements) but cheap for the employee (moving costs). * The labor market is tight. It's better for employers if * transition is expensive for the employee (e.g. high moving costs) but cheap for the employer (finding and training up a replacement is easy). * The job market is tight. Employees would do best to use their leverage as much as possible. It's not like employers won't do exactly the same. This guy's blog sounds like a pretty standard employer whinge about sometimes not having leverage combined with a promise of non-monetary reward if the employee doesn't use their leverage.