3 ms·
It doesn't seem like you read it. It's spelled out as directly as it can be. > I assume this one is most important questions for you now. Why PostgreSQL is und
by jack9 9y ago
It doesn't seem like you read it. It's spelled out as directly as it can be.
> I assume this one is most important questions for you now. Why PostgreSQL is underperforms so significantly? The answer is simple, we’re doing an unfair benchmark.
If PG doesn't perform well, it's unfair.
- ibotty 9y ago> Why PostgreSQL is underperforms so significantly? The answer is simple, we’re doing an unfair benchmark. As you may notice, we were indexing only an ID in a document for MySQL and MongoDB, and an entire document for PostgreSQL. That's hardly biased after and very much before.
- jack9 9y agoThree systems treated the same, have different profiles. PG profile was low enough, the benching had to be altered, to get the results that they were expecting (or the reader to be expecting). If it was a technical implementation issue, why wasn't it done right the first time? Probably hubris, in an obvious case of tweak the testing methodology until you get the result you wanted.