> But, they still have to keep around a big database of child abuse images - and update it regularly, to do this job. IIRC, they already do this, for tracking

> But, they still have to keep around a big database of child abuse images - and update it regularly, to do this job. IIRC, they already do this, for tracking the distribution and source of such images. > It's kind of... icky. No disagreement there. > their models can be used to generate new images of the kind Tools like Photoshop can already do this, and likely to a higher quality than running a conv. net in reverse (so to speak), so I doubt that's a big concern.