5 ms·

I write ClojureScript A good indicator of if a technology is going to explode, is if emerging language users are excited about it, as good ideas tend to trickl

I write ClojureScript A good indicator of if a technology is going to explode, is if emerging language users are excited about it, as good ideas tend to trickle down from the more advanced/research-y ecosystems which aren't as constrained by legacy. So for example React was built by a user of OCaml. ClojureScript early adopted React.js through the Om project in 2013 and there is a growing number of competing React adapters, Clojure rewrites etc. I first saw virtual-dom in ClojureScript in 2012 (eight months before React came out). Number of ClojureScript projects with traction that are based on vue? Zero, that I am aware of.

owebmaster 9y ago
This is my reasoning too. Until someone creates a better reagent and reframe and renatal I'm gonna stick with React
- yogthos 9y ago
  What do you find missing in Reagent currently that works better in React?
  - owebmaster 9y ago
    Nothing (?!).
    - yogthos 9y ago
      So what would you expect to see in a better reagent and reframe and renatal that would make you switch from React?
      - owebmaster 9y ago
        No, what I mean is that I'd only switch from reagent with react for a better-than-reagent fw based on vue.
        yogthos 9y ago
        Ah sorry, I completely misread your original comment. :)
bpicolo 9y ago
Ehhh, I don't think that's really telling in this case. Clojurescript layers plenty on top React, so it's really just a library layer over which cljs devs write entirely different DSLs. The Vue reactive and dom model is pretty much entirely the same as React, it's just its layout for frontend applications that's wildly different. Even if you wanted the component-file style thing in clojure (or html-templates), you wouldn't need Vue to do it.
lsdafjklsd 9y ago
I think it's really people's experience. I'm in your camp, I write functional javascript, I learned clojure, I think about writing software in a way where react-redux (and re-frame) fit the paradigm and get out of the way. Vue seems like Backbone v2 after drawing inspiration from Ember and Angular
moomin 9y ago
Speaking as someone who writes ClojureScript themselves, ClojureScript is definitely in the category of technologies that show no sign of explosion whatsoever. React and Vue are both great technologies, but with Teact the template syntax is optional, and no lisp user wants another syntax...
- wirrbel 9y ago
  I picked up ClojureScript at the end of 2013. I was a C++ developer then in a small firm and was tasked to write a web frontend. Outsourcing that project had failed before (2 times iirc), so my boss bet on me to do it. I knew HTML and had written probably < 1000 lines of Javascript code in my life before. Anyway, I needed to write an interactive single page app (basically it was a visualization of simulation results), so I needed Javascript. But it was so frustrating to write Javascript (also, tooling was mediocre back then or I didn't know it). So at the same time, I stumbled over ClojureScript and had a try (I new Scheme before and was especially outraged by JS syntax quirks, so I hoped S-expressions would rescue me). With ClojureScript in 2013 I had a module system that handled dependencies, an emerging library ecosystem that had what I needed for that specific case, I was pretty happy. This was more advanced than what I got with JS (I might not have found the viable options for such stuff with JS, but at least information on them wasn't widely found then). Last year I had another look at ClojureScript and it felt like a ghost town. This saddens me. There are a few inspiring talks now and then, but nothing I found worth using in a project.
  - subatomic 9y ago
    Not sure about the inspiring talks or whatnot, but I've been writing clojure/clojurescript (reagent, re-frame et al.) professionally for a couple of years and there's nothing I can't find that I need in a project. With simple js interoperability, native use of js/react components in reagent and ease of wrapping any vanilla js library, there really is nothing you can't do with clojurescript. You should take a closer look!
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
  - 9y ago

owebmaster 9y ago

This is my reasoning too. Until someone creates a better reagent and reframe and renatal I'm gonna stick with React

yogthos 9y ago
What do you find missing in Reagent currently that works better in React?
- owebmaster 9y ago
  Nothing (?!).
  - yogthos 9y ago
    So what would you expect to see in a better reagent and reframe and renatal that would make you switch from React?
    - owebmaster 9y ago
      No, what I mean is that I'd only switch from reagent with react for a better-than-reagent fw based on vue.
      - yogthos 9y ago
        Ah sorry, I completely misread your original comment. :)

bpicolo 9y ago

Ehhh, I don't think that's really telling in this case. Clojurescript layers plenty on top React, so it's really just a library layer over which cljs devs write entirely different DSLs. The Vue reactive and dom model is pretty much entirely the same as React, it's just its layout for frontend applications that's wildly different. Even if you wanted the component-file style thing in clojure (or html-templates), you wouldn't need Vue to do it.

lsdafjklsd 9y ago

I think it's really people's experience. I'm in your camp, I write functional javascript, I learned clojure, I think about writing software in a way where react-redux (and re-frame) fit the paradigm and get out of the way. Vue seems like Backbone v2 after drawing inspiration from Ember and Angular

moomin 9y ago

Speaking as someone who writes ClojureScript themselves, ClojureScript is definitely in the category of technologies that show no sign of explosion whatsoever. React and Vue are both great technologies, but with Teact the template syntax is optional, and no lisp user wants another syntax...

wirrbel 9y ago
I picked up ClojureScript at the end of 2013. I was a C++ developer then in a small firm and was tasked to write a web frontend. Outsourcing that project had failed before (2 times iirc), so my boss bet on me to do it. I knew HTML and had written probably < 1000 lines of Javascript code in my life before. Anyway, I needed to write an interactive single page app (basically it was a visualization of simulation results), so I needed Javascript. But it was so frustrating to write Javascript (also, tooling was mediocre back then or I didn't know it). So at the same time, I stumbled over ClojureScript and had a try (I new Scheme before and was especially outraged by JS syntax quirks, so I hoped S-expressions would rescue me). With ClojureScript in 2013 I had a module system that handled dependencies, an emerging library ecosystem that had what I needed for that specific case, I was pretty happy. This was more advanced than what I got with JS (I might not have found the viable options for such stuff with JS, but at least information on them wasn't widely found then). Last year I had another look at ClojureScript and it felt like a ghost town. This saddens me. There are a few inspiring talks now and then, but nothing I found worth using in a project.
- subatomic 9y ago
  Not sure about the inspiring talks or whatnot, but I've been writing clojure/clojurescript (reagent, re-frame et al.) professionally for a couple of years and there's nothing I can't find that I need in a project. With simple js interoperability, native use of js/react components in reagent and ease of wrapping any vanilla js library, there really is nothing you can't do with clojurescript. You should take a closer look!
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
- 9y ago