4 ms·
I see that you have your own opinions, and that you’re emotionally invested in them. The basic premise of your argument is that this is the best we can do for
by tritium 9y ago
I see that you have your own opinions, and that you’re emotionally invested in them.
The basic premise of your argument is that this is the best we can do for now, so that should be acceptable. Not unlike claiming “If you can’t create a painting better than The Mona Lisa yourself, you just have to admit that it’s your favorite painting.”
My mind hasn’t been changed, especially by mere flak that lacks constructive arguments. People may disagree with me freely, but that doesn’t fix the holes I’ve pointed out in existing technology that mesh networks still leave open.
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 9y agoYour are shifting the burden of proof. It's not my job to refute unsubstantiated claims of yours, and failure to do so does not constitute a validation of your claims. You said that, for example, Tor could do things much better, but you didn't put forth any argument as to why you think that/how that could be done. I am not claiming that it's impossible, I am simply rejecting your unsubstantiated claim, and in particular your unsubstantiated criticism of the Tor project. Also, I strongly suspect that any ideas you have in mind have been considered and rejected by the Tor project for very good reasons ... but you'll have to show your actual ideas before I actually know. Also, it's a useless argument to posit an end user who is willing to do anything they are told by an untrusted third party as a useful threat model. There is nothing that will protect against that, and that includes established ISPs.
- tritium 9y agoYou think I care about what you think.
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 9y agoGiven your idiotic argumentation, that seems unlikely.
- tritium 9y agoThat’s a spicy meatball!