3 ms·
Law enforcement already has tons of child porn lying around used primarily to frame people. Of course similar to drug planting it is extremely hard to defend be
by coding123 9y ago
Law enforcement already has tons of child porn lying around used primarily to frame people. Of course similar to drug planting it is extremely hard to defend because no one wants to risk defending someone charged with that. There are exceptions and I'm not saying people like Jared from Subway aren't guilty. There are many many many lesser known individuals that are hushed up using child porn.
So I'm basically saying there is no ethical problem (from their perspective) because feds/cops already deal with this all the time and plant this on people like drugs.
- gamblor956 9y agoYou're wrong on literally all points, but why let the truth get in the way? Law enforcement does collect images that have been traded. They do not use these to frame people, unless you are referring to the honeypot sites that they have taken over. They maintain these sites hoping that CP collectors will continue to download images of their own volition and that they can they trace the IPs to a real-world address. There are many many many lesser known individuals that are hushed up using child porn. Citation needed. This would the first I've heard of CP being used to frame people by law enforcement. It happens, though very rarely, that some people try to frame innocent individuals... So I'm basically saying there is no ethical problem (from their perspective) because feds/cops already deal with this all the time and plant this on people like drugs. So I'm basically saying there is no ethical problem because feds/cops already deal with this all the time, but they don't frame people. They let the idiots hang themselves. And by the way, my source is that I used to defend people like this when I was a public defender. What's your source?