4 ms·

Thank you for this explanation. Until reading it this way my understanding of the whole affair was somewhat wrong. Given that Oracle doesn't seem shy about goi

by icey 16y ago

Thank you for this explanation. Until reading it this way my understanding of the whole affair was somewhat wrong. Given that Oracle doesn't seem shy about going after a giant like Google makes me wonder what other software Sun owned the rights to that might be even remotely popular. If I were a company using a lot of old Sun IP in even moderately unique ways, I'd be a little concerned right now.

nostrademons 16y ago
MySQL? BerkeleyDB?
- seldo 16y ago
  Well, Sun own MySQL. But the drop-in replacement MySQL engine makers (infobright, percona, etc) might be a little worried.
  - JoachimSchipper 16y ago
    The comment you're replying to pointed out that Oracle owns MySQL (acquired with Sun) and BerkeleyDB (acquired with SleepyCat).
    - seldo 16y ago
      I had forgotten they also owned BerkeleyDB (obviously I know that Oracle own Sun, is that why I'm getting downmodded?). But my point still stands: makers of replacement engines for MySQL could be in violation of MySQL-related patents, which Oracle could then sue over.
      - bravo_sierra 16y ago
        They could, but they haven't, and probably won't. Oracle had a big database-related portfolio long before they acquired Sun/MySQL, which had relatively few. They even bought Innobase, makers of the InnoDB engine a few years ago. Other database vendors (Percona et al., not IBM) don't have assets for Oracle to take, don't directly threaten their core business, and going after them would get Oracle in trouble with regulators. Better to land a tuna than chase sardines around.