3 ms·

So are you against municipalities having the right to determine their own laws and regulations then? Just because you don't like the law doesn't mean you can ig

So are you against municipalities having the right to determine their own laws and regulations then? Just because you don't like the law doesn't mean you can ignore it. My point is not whether or not the regulations should exist, in many cases they probably should not. I was just pointing out that having companies willing to operate in legal gray areas could have a distorting effect on the existing market. The original question was what regulators could do, and an answer is to enforcing existing laws where applicable.

matt_the_bass 9y ago
I'm for municipalities having the right to create laws and regulations that are in the best interest of their overall population. I'm not in favor of municipalities making laws that favor rich special interest groups that only serve a small subset of the population. I'm in favor of protecting small companies from practices of large companies that are unsustainable (like subsidizing rider costs to win market share) in which small companies can't compete. I'm not in favor of protecting small companies just because they are sustainable. And I agree with you about enforcing all rules including ones I don't agree with. But I'd like to get rid of those that I don't think are for the protection of the community at large. I guess I should have said that I agree with some of those regulations and not others (rather than saying one should or shouldn't ahear to them). Thank you for pointing that out.