3 ms·
That's what their story is, but unlikely to be true. All "horrific" pictures will have to be graded by a human, because you have the right to face your accuser,
by Brotkrumen 9y ago
That's what their story is, but unlikely to be true. All "horrific" pictures will have to be graded by a human, because you have the right to face your accuser, the service providers will not let you near their codebase and AI won't be 100% accurate in the next few years.
What they will be able to do with that software is trawl through orders of magnitudes more pictures, filter by probable hits and show those to staff. Right now someone has to be suspected to warrant the expensive attention of an expert. With that software you can fish in everyone's data.
- IanCal 9y agoCases reported in the media usually talk about people having thousands of pictures each, I wasn't talking about thousands of different people.
- Brotkrumen 9y agoThats the point. None of the 90% normal pictures will do any psychological damage, the 10% illegal pictures will but those will have to be looked at anyway. The advantage of an algo detecting illegal content isn't in protecting civil servants, it's scanning everyone without them.