3 ms·
This article from 2007 might be of interest: "How Google routed around Sun's IP-based licensing restrictions on Java ME": http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/l
by j-g-faustus 16y ago
This article from 2007 might be of interest:
"How Google routed around Sun's IP-based licensing restrictions on Java ME": http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/ http://www.betaversion.org/~stefano/linotype/news/110/
It's apparently not a complete surprise, this guy in 2007 predicted that
... in the future expect a shit-load of IP-related lawsuits
on this.
- superjared 16y agoAnother interesting tidbit from the article you linked: The trick is that Google doesn’t claim that Android is a Java platform, although it can run some programs written with the Java language and against some derived version of the Java class library. Sun could prevent this if they had a patent on the standard class library, but they don’t and, even if they did, I strongly doubt it would be enforceable since Android doesn’t claim to be compatible (and in fact, could very well claim that their subset/superset is an innovation on the existing patent and challenge Sun’s position).
- wmf 16y agoIf by "interesting" you mean "totally misunderstands patent law". What Google claims is irrelevant; either they use Oracle's patented techniques or they don't.