6 ms·
Wait, really? That’s shocking to me - I would have assumed the entire link was encrypted E2E. Are there technical limitations that make this infeasible?
by telekid 9y ago
Wait, really? That’s shocking to me - I would have assumed the entire link was encrypted E2E. Are there technical limitations that make this infeasible?
- nugi 9y agoImagine the hardware required to encrypt that much data on the fly... not so shocking anymore is it?
- ris 9y agoConsidering that AMD processors now have the streaming encryption capacity to encrypt data as it travels to and from the memory controller, I think we're at a point where performing high bandwidth symmetric encryption is not significantly more expensive than the existing encoding/transport costs.
- Pyxl101 9y agoIndeed. It seems like we ought to be able to do encryption in hardware at arbitrary speeds without a lot of cost by this point. (No?)
- solotronics 9y agoas a network engineer for the most part we consider it the responsibility of the end user to encrypt their traffic, we function mostly as the freeway of the internet. some exceptions are when we have links through enemy territory such as through a foreign territory we are traditionally adversarial with. There are exceptions such as Google's anger at their backbone being snooped.