4 ms·
Thank you, that's the kind of answer I was looking for. Those are indeed not things I've worked with. > I've heard that pgAdmin 4 is awful. I've heard the sam
by jorams 9y ago
Thank you, that's the kind of answer I was looking for. Those are indeed not things I've worked with.
> I've heard that pgAdmin 4 is awful.
I've heard the same. I wasn't a fan of pgAdmin 3 either, so I've stuck with the psql command line.
- gaius 9y agoThank you, that's the kind of answer I was looking for I love that in the HN community we can have these conversations without it descending into a platform war :-) I did alot of Oracle up to SQL Server 2012 then just didn't need it any more, SQL Server + PG 9 and now 10 hit all my use cases for a tiny fraction of the cost. Now I wonder why so many people still pay so much for it.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- orf 9y ago> I've heard the same. I wasn't a fan of pgAdmin 3 either, so I've stuck with the psql command line. In case you haven't heard of it, I highly highly recommend pgcli[1] if anyone reading this is doing the same as you and me but hasn't highly customized their psql shell yet. It's one of those tools I wish I had known about earlier. 1. https://www.pgcli.com/ https://www.pgcli.com/