5 ms·
In the case you mentioned, that's basically "credibility." Although a lame story, Let's say you are responsible for initiating and managing a new software proj
by raldu 9y ago
In the case you mentioned, that's basically "credibility."
Although a lame story, Let's say you are responsible for initiating and managing a new software project in your company with complex bureaucracy and management. You have found that it is highly feasible to work with Agile methodology instead of Waterfall.
But Waterfall has been how the things had always been done, yet you know that the team is ready for Agile and project is an exact type of work that would benefit from some "lean" approaches. Worse still, management won't listen, also because "The Board" won't listen.
What you do is that you go to that well-known, highly-paid consultant, discuss the situation and he basically says, "OK, You are right. Also this and that."
Then in your presentation to the board while pitching Agile, you say, "Agile is the way to go. I asked Patrick Kalzumeus, and he said it was a good idea."
And that's it.
That "credibility" is one of many ways how a business consultant may "add value" to a highly organized company.
- drdeadringer 9y agoHow do employees gain credibility that management and "The Board" will listen to, or is this question a dream?
- jwhitlark 9y agoI think it's more about getting a credible outside second opinion. for the same reasons you get a second opinion in medicine. It's less a judgement about a single source, than the requirement to have multiple sources.
- popinman322 9y agoProbably by assessing and presenting the cost/benefit analysis to management in a reliable, high quality, easy-to-understand way.
- dleslie 9y agoSounds like a situation where there exists a fundamental absence of trust in the abilities of the team. That's... Probably not a good thing.