Characterizing a compromise that gains them progress in one area in exchange for allowing the other party to stall in another area, characterizing that as "a fu

Characterizing a compromise that gains them progress in one area in exchange for allowing the other party to stall in another area, characterizing that as "a full stop" is rather disingenuous. What no one seems to be addressing or making a good case for in their criticisms is why allowing that stalling tactic is so very bad that it overshadows progress in locking in net neutrality protections in the wired realm.