3 ms·
The article you're referring to[1] only talks about a single group of hunter-gatherers, the !Kung. And all things considered, they do not work less than we do.
by adrice727 9y ago
The article you're referring to[1] only talks about a single group of hunter-gatherers, the !Kung. And all things considered, they do not work less than we do.
. . . his original estimate of 12-19 hours worked per week did not include food processing, tool making, or general housework, and when such activities were included he estimated that the !Kung worked about 40-44 hours per week.
How many people do you know that spend 44 hours or less per week working, commuting, grocery shopping, cooking, doing housework, running errands, etc.?
[1] http://quillette.com/2017/12/16/romanticizing-hunter-gatherer/?utm_source=pocket&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pockethits http://quillette.com/2017/12/16/romanticizing-hunter-gathere...
- slphil 9y agoDid you finish reading the article? It gets far worse than numbers of hours worked (and the !Kung score quite well on many metrics compared to other hunter-gatherers). Humans stopped being hunter-gatherers for a reason.