3 ms·
I agree but a lot of people (myself included) thought Google was large, rich, smart, respected and brazen enough to fight this fight so we were all thrilled whe
by dschobel 16y ago
I agree but a lot of people (myself included) thought Google was large, rich, smart, respected and brazen enough to fight this fight so we were all thrilled when they dropped the gauntlet against the carriers.
At this point I'm just dying to find out what they saw on the horizon that made them come to a full stop.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- mkramlich 16y agoExactly. If Google with it's billions and market position is willing to bendover like this, what chance do smaller players have, even a consortium of them?
- nooneelse 16y agoCharacterizing a compromise that gains them progress in one area in exchange for allowing the other party to stall in another area, characterizing that as "a full stop" is rather disingenuous. What no one seems to be addressing or making a good case for in their criticisms is why allowing that stalling tactic is so very bad that it overshadows progress in locking in net neutrality protections in the wired realm.