I wonder if you meant to post "There's an argument you need math, because math is logic.", which is tangentially true, but that's not the point i'm making. > T

I wonder if you meant to post "There's an argument you need math, because math is logic.", which is tangentially true, but that's not the point i'm making. > There's an argument that you need math to explain it because it is math * More specifically, it's a mathematical idea, so, in order to explain it, it would be impossible not to use other mathematical ideas. These other ideas exist throughout the article and are [incorrectly] separated from what the average person thinks when they hear "math" but it's math, nonetheless. For instance, the many graphs throughout the article should be recognized as math.