You are now being completely dishonest. First article: > Priebus did not cite any evidence to back up his apparent bombshell. > The White House said in a sta

You are now being completely dishonest. First article: > Priebus did not cite any evidence to back up his apparent bombshell. > The White House said in a statement to the Daily News that Priebus "was addressing hacking generally, not election manipulation." > But none of the intelligence reports have officially said China or North Korea played a part in that, calling into question where Priebus got his information. The second article does not even mention election interference or even swaying public opinion AT ALL, even slightly. Did you read past the headline? Because by "China Just Won The U.S. Election" the article describes that Trump's policies would be "a win" for China. Not that they got Trump elected. You are deliberately muddying the waters in bad faith. I'm not that stupid. Goodbye.