4 ms·
> There's an argument that you need math to explain it because it is math Sounds like circular reasoning. There's an argument you need logic, because math is l
by smokeyj 9y ago
> There's an argument that you need math to explain it because it is math
Sounds like circular reasoning. There's an argument you need logic, because math is logic.
- msla 9y agoThe hand points at the Moon. The dog barks at the hand. Math is confused with arithmetic, which is one tiny subset of math, and notation, which isn't math at all but is merely a tool mathematicians use to communicate more clearly because some concepts are too bulky when you attempt to express them using words. The essence of math is careful reasoning, following step-by-step processes to derive new truths from existing ones. If you do that, you're doing math, and if you do it without arithmetic or notation, people will say you're doing math without math.
- johnhenry 9y agoI wonder if you meant to post "There's an argument you need math, because math is logic.", which is tangentially true, but that's not the point i'm making. > There's an argument that you need math to explain it because it is math * More specifically, it's a mathematical idea, so, in order to explain it, it would be impossible not to use other mathematical ideas. These other ideas exist throughout the article and are [incorrectly] separated from what the average person thinks when they hear "math" but it's math, nonetheless. For instance, the many graphs throughout the article should be recognized as math.