5 ms·
I think this PR tactic became common because this is probably the most obvious way of responding to something that one (Google in this case) thinks is a rumor o
by prat 16y ago
I think this PR tactic became common because this is probably the most obvious way of responding to something that one (Google in this case) thinks is a rumor or inaccuracy.
even though the parallels are disingenuous, I would refrain from citing this as a reason for feeling suspicious.
- cal5k 16y agoFair enough. However, my objection is that it paints an overly simplistic picture of the "myth" by reducing it to a one-line straw man which can then easily be dismantled in the "fact" section. So while it's true that it is important to evaluate the content presented, it is also critical to consider the content not included either by commission or omission.