The bigger issue raised in the article is the idea that, even when algorithms are an "improvement" on human bias, the public is willing to accept that they expr

The bigger issue raised in the article is the idea that, even when algorithms are an "improvement" on human bias, the public is willing to accept that they express no bias at all. That level of trust in technology is unfair, and it doesn't exist for human judgement - if people are more confident in exercising oversight, that's at least one reason to not switch over to purely algorithmic decision-making.