> I think this assumption may be underestimating your reader You probably nailed it right there. Although I swear this was not intentional, reading your commen

> I think this assumption may be underestimating your reader You probably nailed it right there. Although I swear this was not intentional, reading your comment and re-reading my article myself made me realize this might be the unfortunate effect of me not knowing exactly what audience would be interested by my article. As my first article on the topic of events, which was pure "theory" (meaning no code at all), got me questions on "how to use it though?", I wanted to write something with actual usable examples. Reading your opinion however, I might have messed up and, trying to be "more practical" ended up being "(too) simple"... In any case, I will try to get more opinions -- thanks a lot for yours! Accurate and not insulting by any means, I'd love it if I could more of these -- and perhaps rewrite the analogy part into something more "meaty".