4 ms·
Yes, because we want people with sufficient money to be the only ones with a voice, and we want their voices to massively outweigh the voices of everyone else.
by aalleavitch 9y ago
Yes, because we want people with sufficient money to be the only ones with a voice, and we want their voices to massively outweigh the voices of everyone else. That's definitely what someone who cares about democracy would want.
- eru 9y agoThe supposedly money-restricted alternative is not the democratic utopia you paint, but the place where only established machines can compete.