> If the article showed that she knows how Bitcoin works - keys, signing, etc you fault the person being interviewed for the job of the interviewer? bitcoin i

> If the article showed that she knows how Bitcoin works - keys, signing, etc you fault the person being interviewed for the job of the interviewer? bitcoin is more than 'keys, signing, etc[sic]' from tfa: > I have been making my clients mine for me for a couple of years. > I take donations and also have people mining for me. I take a lot of geek clients who like new technology and they were really excited when I taught them how to build a mining rig for me this person states over a period of years she has amassed 1M+$ having taken donations in cryptocurrencies, shipped a successful remote mining pool, and even taught others how to build their own mining rigs and your response is the article needs to show she knows about 'keys'? how do you propose someone does those things while also being ignorant of, what i assume you mean by 'keys', public key cryptography? that would be incredibly impressive in its own right here is the full quote you keep referencing: "Everyone is now interested in bitcoin because the growth has been exponential. Soon it will be too high for individuals to invest in, so you have to invest in others. I think it’s smart to have diverse portfolios of currency. "