4 ms·
The ING paper continues "The fact that they [banks] do not (yet) provide custodian functions for Bitcoin (e.g. for regulatory reasons) does not mean that the
by theoh 9y ago
The ING paper continues "The fact that
they [banks] do not (yet) provide custodian functions for Bitcoin (e.g. for regulatory reasons)
does not mean that the general public would not need or want those services for
cryptocurrency. In fact, many Bitcoin users choose to keep their wallets with online
providers – meaning that even in today’s Bitcoin universe, there is a clear role for
intermediaries."
The Bitcoin/blockchain-agnostic term for the basic abstraction these intermediaries share is "distributed ledger", though that doesn't solve the whole problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_ledger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_ledger