43 ms·
It's true, here is the updated license: http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload-March2009/licence.php?lang=us&type=GeForce http://www.nvidia.com/content/Dr
by sabalaba 9y ago
It's true, here is the updated license: http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload-March2009/licence.php?lang=us&type=GeForce http://www.nvidia.com/content/DriverDownload-March2009/licen....
Text:
No Datacenter Deployment. The SOFTWARE is not licensed for datacenter deployment,
except that blockchain processing in a datacenter is permitted.
- jacquesm 9y agoSo, once again proof that open source is the only way to go.
- freeone3000 9y agoOpen-source drivers don't even support Tesla, not to mention Volta. An EULA challenge seems to the way to go here. I'll be emailing legal for advice once I get back to work.
- SauciestGNU 9y agoI think the point is less using nouveau drivers for nvidia hardware as it is we should have never accepted CUDA as a standard since the implementation isn't free. Proprietary standards leave us at the mercy of the owners.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- zvrba 9y agoThere's no date on the page itself, and the link contains the string "March2009". Is this really a recent change? EDIT: just tried to download a driver, and this is the page that gets displayed.