4 ms·
Weird though, because school/work is the most common place for couples to meet. Your opinion is another example of ivory-tower syndrome, or living in an ultra-l
by eanzenberg 9y ago
Weird though, because school/work is the most common place for couples to meet. Your opinion is another example of ivory-tower syndrome, or living in an ultra-liberal bubble.
Coworkers abstaining has more to do with risk (greater on the men’s side). Elites have always tried controlling sexual freedom and exploration because it threatens their control over literally creating future elite generations.
The sexual revolution absolutely improved women’s prospects from the Eisenhower era. Instead of forced to religious-coupling or pushed into traditional female roles, instead women were able to more freely choose their mate.
- rayiner 9y agoWork is at 10% of relationships and rapidly falling: https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.com/public/ARQXH32AVQ4KTP4255WUYDHHUQ.png https://arc-anglerfish-washpost-prod-washpost.s3.amazonaws.c.... In a few decades it’s going to be socially unacceptable to hit on coworkers. “If I were looking for a date, I’d be on tinder!” As to the sexual revolution, read Dworkin’s take on it. Her point that it is a distinctly a man-centric view of sexual freedom is prescient. It’s not just about being free to have sex whenever/with whoever you want, but also freedom to live aspects of your life without dealing with sexual advances. It’s about the freedom to go to work and have coworkers look at you as someone who can help advance their careers, or someone who they can mentor, not a potential date.