2 ms·

I said that it was explained there. That you can also find people who get things wrong only reinforces my point about this being a common misunderstanding of t

by JdeBP 9y ago

I said that it was explained there. That you can also find people who get things wrong only reinforces my point about this being a common misunderstanding of the DNS. All of those not-very-choice-at-all quotes were debunked in that discussion, including the bunkum that this is a systemd thing, disproven by the fact that these sorts of assertions had to be debunked years before systemd was even invented.

benchaney 9y ago
If by "it was explained there" you mean "there was a discussion there and some people agree with me", then sure "it was explained there". In fact, neither of those quotes were debunked, the only attempt to debunk them is based on the idea that there were two revolvers before systemd-resolved, and only one of them held this behavior. That is a really silly arguments because the main complaint is that systemd-resolved is being used as a drop in replacement that doesn't obey the defacto spec established by its predecessor. The irony here is that there are real arguments for changing the behavior (and real arguments against it), but you are ignoring them to instead insist that any complaints are "debunked" when they clearly aren't.