4 ms·
These claims are an important follow-on to claims made by the FCC that ISPs were holding back on investment because of net neutrality, therefore it had to be re
by Isamu 9y ago
These claims are an important follow-on to claims made by the FCC that ISPs were holding back on investment because of net neutrality, therefore it had to be repealed.
So this is a way of publicly backing up the FCC, and heading off possible independent action by congress.
It's a kind of theater ... what if they never got it repealed? So they would never re-invest in their business?
- Isamu 9y agoI guess it makes sense if you read it as: we have this money that now we can spend on schemes that violate net neutrality and shake down businesses that cross our path!