4 ms·

> That iPhones retain their value over time is a testament to the fact that Apple has not been slowing down old iPhones Not at all. It's a testament that there

> That iPhones retain their value over time is a testament to the fact that Apple has not been slowing down old iPhones Not at all. It's a testament that there is a market for old iPhones, that is all. People are possibly buying used iPhones despite them being slowed down. > Apple actually has an incentive to create the longest lasting iPhone because the economics of the iPhone Upgrade Plan and every carrier upgrade plan depends on it. Then why don't they? <5 years for an electronic device that hasn't seen any significant upgrades in later models is absurdly short.

IBM 9y ago
The lower depreciation of an iPhone compared to any comparable smartphone is directly correlated to the quality of the iPhone. This isn't new, anyone who buys used cars understands this. More importantly, it's an independent (of Apple) market that is constantly repricing this. And the results have been clear: iPhones retain their value much better than anything else. Just as we can use the price of iOS zero-day exploits in the black market as a proxy for how secure iOS has become over the years, we can also look at the resale market for iPhones.
- CaptSpify 9y ago
  > The lower depreciation of an iPhone compared to any comparable smartphone is directly correlated to the quality of the iPhone That is not true, nor has it ever been for phones or cars. People buy each for all kinds of reasons: status symbols, ideals, etc. iPhones demonstrably do not retain their value as demonstrated by this battery fiasco. After-Market value != quality