> I don't really understand this attitude. Mozilla doesn't need to be everything I ever wanted from a browser in order to get my support. Having a Mozilla opti

> I don't really understand this attitude. Mozilla doesn't need to be everything I ever wanted from a browser in order to get my support. Having a Mozilla option is good, but when Mozilla screws up it needs to get a clear indication that it did. I think folks saying "down with Mozilla" do not really mean this 100%; but they do want Mozilla to know that it seriously screwed up in their view. And we should not treat it as a shrinking violet -- it is not a tiny startup; it is a large corporation with funding in hundreds of millions. > It only needs to be better than Google. This, IMO, is setting the bar way too low. It should aim to do what the users want and consumer technology easily allows. If there is a big gap between those we should encourage new entrants, not entrench Mozilla as "the" alternative to pick-your-evil. My 2c.