3 ms·
> "In fact, it is not uncommon for a Tibetan monk to live to 120 years of age" Just one of many sources its very well documented that monks live very long live
by 1undo 9y ago
> "In fact, it is not uncommon for a Tibetan monk to live to 120 years of age"
Just one of many sources its very well documented that monks live very long lives. Not sure why hes being downvoted.
blog.peterbaksa.com/post/9719815756/tibetan-monks-my-lama-temple-interviews
- Danihan 9y agoIt's totally true.. links to Law of Attraction blog Come on now.
- tree_of_item 9y agoHe's being downvoted because it's not true. The oldest person on record was 122. If there were a bunch of Tibetan monks walking around at 120+ we'd know about it.
- 1undo 9y agoMany eastern tibetan monks claim to be 120+ years old. Due to the nature of their lives its very hard to document birth to death. Of course people deny it because its not "on record." likely due to longevity bias that humans naturally have. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity_myths https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity_myths
- jack9 9y agoThere's true, false, not proven. It (claim to be 120+ years old) is not proven. Necessarily, it's not true. If it becomes true in the future, the studies would be interesting. That's obvious. Basing any sort of continued argument or worse, research, on wishful thinking is something left up to you.
- Ngunyan 9y ago> It is not proven. Necessarily, it's not true. Nope. Unproven means its either true or false. There's just no record to decide which it is.
- cat199 9y agoJust like everyone knows about the drastically different disease rate in orthodox monks? https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-foolproof-anti-cancer-diet-with-just-one-or-two-drawbacks-w69qbltbh9b https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/a-foolproof-anti-cancer-d...