3 ms·
I can't edit my post anymore, but you're correct that the payments went to an entity that Steele owns, and Steele's own comment (as user nautilus) describes it
by jawns 9y ago
I can't edit my post anymore, but you're correct that the payments went to an entity that Steele owns, and Steele's own comment (as user nautilus) describes it as a pass-through. So I'm willing to let that go.
The rest of my opinion hasn't changed, though. I think Steele is using his staff's ignorance as a red herring, and I highly doubt that top-rate writers will want to work for Nautilus in the future.
- pvg 9y agoSo I'm willing to let that go. You're willing to let it go? You accused someone of some kind of massive financial impropriety without any serious evidence. Other people started repeating it as fact. You owe that person an apology and a retraction and yourself some reflection beyond a rather generous 'letting it go'.
- praneshp 9y ago> So I'm willing to let that go. Ha who the hell are you to let anything go? You are a liar that made a random claim without bothering to verify anything.
- pdabbadabba 9y agoNow I think we're getting a little harsh. I agree that GP was incorrect, but I don't see any reason to think this was anything more than a good-faith misreading of a less-than-clear form.