4 ms·
aha! I interpreted "the second TIAM object" as "the new TIAM object", as opposed to the second of the original objects. Thank you for the clarification :)
by wcarss 16y ago
aha!
I interpreted "the second TIAM object" as "the new TIAM object", as opposed to the second of the original objects. Thank you for the clarification :)
- todayiamme 16y agoI learned something just the same. Thanks a lot!