3 ms·
It's 2 to the 32nd power, not 232 :-)
by jjoonathan 9y ago
It's 2 to the 32nd power, not 232 :-)
- tzahola 9y agoOh well, that makes more sense than 232. But then again, it lets you fit the bookkeping data into a single 64bit word (32bit pointer + 32bit size).