Why is an "SV-based disrupter" at all necessary? That's an absurd and bizarre question. Just pay them - you say you read it often, yet you don't pay. Say you

Why is an "SV-based disrupter" at all necessary? That's an absurd and bizarre question. Just pay them - you say you read it often, yet you don't pay. Say you read 6 articles there per year - that works out to a whole $4/article, or equivalent to one fancy coffee every two months. To defer instead to some "SV-based disrupter" to act as the person who will pay for it on your behalf seems exceptionally lazy on your part. Just pay for the things you benefit from. Constantly using services while hoping someone else will pay for them is why we can't have nice things that last. (And yes, I pay for it - I like the print version that shows up every so often, in addition to the articles I read online).