3 ms·
Some of these comments arguing that it's 'correct' behavior begs the question, do we want 'correct' or 'predictably expect-able' behavior. What i mean by that i
by stevemk14ebr 9y ago
Some of these comments arguing that it's 'correct' behavior begs the question, do we want 'correct' or 'predictably expect-able' behavior. What i mean by that is most people would likely not expect a car to turn into that lane, even though it is 'correct'. Perhaps instead of following the rules so rigidly it should SOMETIMES break the rules to do the thing more like a human would, making it an all together safer system as humans would better be able to predict it's actions and adjust accordingly.
This of course imposes lots of philosophical problems like which rules can be broken, and which not.
- pessimizer 9y agoI'd think in this case that ideally what we would want was for the Uber's behavior to become normalized among non-robot drivers, and become 'predictably expect-able.' What the Uber is doing is actually correct rather than 'correct.'
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoWhat really should happen is for humans to be taught about the correct behavior. This is a rule that should be enforced rigidly. Turning across bike lanes instead of from them endangers the lives of cyclists. Just because most drivers don't care whether cyclists live or die doesn't mean that it is the right thing to do.
- user5994461 9y agoJust because it's the expected behavior in california doesn't make it correct or right in the rest of the world. The other comments pointed out that california have dashed lines for bicycle lanes around intersections. That may be the signal.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]