4 ms·
Their criticism wasn't of the law but of the undue influence of lobbyists in the American political system.
by wasx 9y ago
Their criticism wasn't of the law but of the undue influence of lobbyists in the American political system.
- emodendroket 9y agoIf you "cannot trust regulators or legislators at the federal level" how can you trust the laws? Who writes them, and who enforces them, if not legislators and regulators, respectively?
- wasx 9y agoRight but they're not saying they don't trust regulators and legislators as a concept, they're saying they don't trust them when they're basically writing what lobbyists tell them to. It's right they don't trust the law, but their criticism isn't of law and regulation. It's of lobbyists.
- emodendroket 9y agoBut I mean if they're really completely compromised then it doesn't much matter. I share the OP's concerns but I think he goes too far in his claims.
- yakt 9y agoWe better pay attention to his "too far in claims" before it becomes too far in damage and deaths.
- kevin_thibedeau 9y agoLegislators tend to not write the laws anymore. They just take the copy the lobby groups have prepared in advance and submit it as a bill. Congressmen don't even bother to read the laws they vote for.
- emodendroket 9y agoThey do not literally write the laws in most cases but I don't see how that affects the argument.