> I'd hardly call a different keyboard layout a revolutionary idea Yes. It wasn't my intention to imply that an alternative keyboard layout would be a revoluti

> I'd hardly call a different keyboard layout a revolutionary idea Yes. It wasn't my intention to imply that an alternative keyboard layout would be a revolutionary idea. The example was meant to illustrate how a non-revolutionary idea (virtual 2D screens in VR), after establishing itself, can make it difficult/impossible for other ideas to take hold. > You need a big leap to beat the inertia of the existing systems. It's good to point, that once an idea becomes mainstream, even research into revolutionary alternatives will dry up compared to those focused on incrementally improving the mainstream, making it even more unlikely that the leap would happen.