> It seems like we are talking about different things. No one is arguing that there shouldn't be multiple map interfaces, but rather that if the data was shared

> It seems like we are talking about different things. No one is arguing that there shouldn't be multiple map interfaces, but rather that if the data was shared, you could have more investment in the interesting parts. Data is the interesting part. And it needs more investment. Data is the valuable part. UX has very little relevance here. Companies are competing on what matters and what gives them a competitive edge. Map UX doesn't. Map data does.