I think it will depend on how it ends up being interpreted, and maybe we can work with legislators to provide more guidance there in the final Bill. To me, if

I think it will depend on how it ends up being interpreted, and maybe we can work with legislators to provide more guidance there in the final Bill. To me, if I am paying for a 50mpbs Internet access, and I am only getting 25 or 30, because the rest is devoted to "specialized services", then they are threatening the meaningful availability of the service I am paying for. If however I am paying for 50 mbps, and getting 50-55 mbps, and my ISP is offering an over priced Voip package, I don't think it is interfering in a meaningful way (obviously this ignores latency, which is also an important factor, for simplicity of the example).