4 ms·

https://twitter.com/Woodshedagency/status/943508162002513923 https://twitter.com/Woodshedagency/status/943508162002513923

rabidonrails 9y ago
"Sorry, you are not authorized to see this status."
DoreenMichele 9y ago
"These Tweets are protected Only approved followers can see @Woodshedagency's Tweets. To request access, click Follow. Learn more." This does not exactly make them look like innocent above board victims of libel.
- slazaro 9y ago
  They've now posted their response, and if true, everything on their side makes sense, and makes this situation a good example of not 100% trusting one sided accusations without having the other side's version first.
  - DoreenMichele 9y ago
    Well, it is rather annoying to be crabbed at like I was on a witch hunt. I also wrote this comment which was downvoted into the negatives and remains at zero: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971899 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971899 The witch-hunt atmosphere in this thread is not my doing. Other people chose to upvote comments that agreed with the one sided smear campaign and downvote anything arguing for a more evenhanded approach. Please note the final paragraph of that comment was added after it was downvoted into the negatives and initially was prefaced with "I have no idea why this is being downvoted, but... " So I feel rather aggravated with my entire experience of this discussion. Get downvoted for an evenhanded comment, then later get lectured for a different one that could be framed as agreement with the smear campaign. Not to self: Maybe I need to just avoid mudslinging discussions on HN lest I get mud slung all over me, no matter what I do. Trying to be a voice of reason in the face of this crap apparently does not do any good at all.
VectorLock 9y ago
For a PR agency I'd consider this as officially "going to ground."
- kjrose 9y ago
  Yeah. They’ve gone completely to ground. I am guessing in the hopes it will blow over before it becomes bigger. They claimed in a tweet earlier today that they were preparing a response however the fact they locked off their channel seems to imply their response is duck and cover.
  - stablemap 9y ago
    Thanks for summarizing it—I didn’t anticipate their locking the account.
- DoreenMichele 9y ago
  I did not know this expression. For others who might not know it: https://britishisms.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/go-to-ground/ https://britishisms.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/go-to-ground/

rabidonrails 9y ago

"Sorry, you are not authorized to see this status."

DoreenMichele 9y ago

"These Tweets are protected Only approved followers can see @Woodshedagency's Tweets. To request access, click Follow. Learn more." This does not exactly make them look like innocent above board victims of libel.

slazaro 9y ago
They've now posted their response, and if true, everything on their side makes sense, and makes this situation a good example of not 100% trusting one sided accusations without having the other side's version first.
- DoreenMichele 9y ago
  Well, it is rather annoying to be crabbed at like I was on a witch hunt. I also wrote this comment which was downvoted into the negatives and remains at zero: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971899 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15971899 The witch-hunt atmosphere in this thread is not my doing. Other people chose to upvote comments that agreed with the one sided smear campaign and downvote anything arguing for a more evenhanded approach. Please note the final paragraph of that comment was added after it was downvoted into the negatives and initially was prefaced with "I have no idea why this is being downvoted, but... " So I feel rather aggravated with my entire experience of this discussion. Get downvoted for an evenhanded comment, then later get lectured for a different one that could be framed as agreement with the smear campaign. Not to self: Maybe I need to just avoid mudslinging discussions on HN lest I get mud slung all over me, no matter what I do. Trying to be a voice of reason in the face of this crap apparently does not do any good at all.

VectorLock 9y ago

For a PR agency I'd consider this as officially "going to ground."

kjrose 9y ago
Yeah. They’ve gone completely to ground. I am guessing in the hopes it will blow over before it becomes bigger. They claimed in a tweet earlier today that they were preparing a response however the fact they locked off their channel seems to imply their response is duck and cover.
- stablemap 9y ago
  Thanks for summarizing it—I didn’t anticipate their locking the account.
DoreenMichele 9y ago
I did not know this expression. For others who might not know it: https://britishisms.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/go-to-ground/ https://britishisms.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/go-to-ground/