3 ms·
It is backed up by evidence, though[0]. I think it was meant to validate that the model of ride sharing isn't morally bankrupt merely because it is owned by ven
by abakker 9y ago
It is backed up by evidence, though[0]. I think it was meant to validate that the model of ride sharing isn't morally bankrupt merely because it is owned by venture capitalists.
[0] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/business/uber-drunk-driving-prevention.html?_r=0 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/07/business/uber-drunk-drivi...
- toomuchtodo 9y agoRide sharing isn't morally bankrupt when properly delivered and regulated. Uber is morally bankrupt, regardless of the positive impacts they've had. There are some holes that are simply too deep to be dug out of.
- abakker 9y agoProbably. It is a very interesting case study in corporate culture and corporate viability. Unless the culture changes, it seems difficult to believe that they can stay operational. it is also interesting to watch something with that much inertia slowing down by inches.
- toomuchtodo 9y agoThe wheels of justice and government turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine.