3 ms·
> For me, using Firefox is the personal conscious choice you refer to. Firefox marketing is effective but to be clear they have begun changing direction, pursu
by j_s 9y ago
> For me, using Firefox is the personal conscious choice you refer to.
Firefox marketing is effective but to be clear they have begun changing direction, pursuing a more practical "attracting the masses" approach (a la Signal) rather than paranoid/hyper-vigilant/engineer-style idealism (something some misinterpret Firefox marketing as still claiming), and as a result Firefox has been forced to course-correct several times due to public outcry.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15940144 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15940144
A recent eye-opener for me personally was discovering telemetry's switch from opt-in to opt-out as of September.
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/#firefox-by-default-shares-data-to https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/privacy/firefox/#firefox-by-de... (3 months ago) vs. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Telemetry/FAQ#Is_Telemetry_enabled_by_default_on_normal_Firefox_releases.3F https://wiki.mozilla.org/Telemetry/FAQ#Is_Telemetry_enabled_... (3 years ago)
- bigbugbag 9y agoI would not be surprised if the move to opt-out spying is consequences of the dropping ALSA and adding a hard dependency to pulseaudio fiasco. Telemetry has been held as one of the main justification for the change as it supposedly showed only a fraction of users used ALSA. It turned out to be a combination of misinterpretation of collected data (installed libpulse does not mean not using ALSA) and a complete ignorance of the real world (most linux distros disable telemetry because privacy, people using ALSA are often the same that take extra measures to protect their privacy hence disabling mozilla spying mechanisms). As a consequence mozilla pushed hard for package maintainers to enable telemetry in linux distros and sadly most did, see: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1233687 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1233687 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285195 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285195 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285201 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1285201 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firefox.git/commit/?id=b2b845f7ba35 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firefox.git/commit/?... Compare to this from 7 years ago: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667577 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667577 The fun part was when mozilla people started patronizing users for protecting their privacy and told them that it's their fault if ALSA got dropped and that they should relinquish their privacy instead or they will be ignored: Second, continuing to opt out of telemetry will just make problems like this worse. As was stated in this thread, one of the justifications for removing ALSA support was that the telemetry numbers showed a very little ALSA usage. If more ALSA users had telemetry enabled, perhaps the outcome would have been different. In any case, running without telemetry means not having a say in data-driven decisions about what configurations Mozilla should support. It's OK to disable telemetry (that's why it's user-controllable), but both users and distros that make decisions on users' behalf should to take into account that if don't let Firefox send info about your system config to Mozilla, your system config is invisible to Mozilla's decision making about what to support. source: Rationalising Linux audio backend support - https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.platform/jRAqSTri66I/2Lu7BX4SBgAJ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.platform/j... There was no course correction here, ALSA is still out despite the issue being entirely to mozilla implementation and not ALSA abilities, despite this being an edge case for linux netflix users with a specific 5.1 setup and despite someone coming forward to offer to fix and maintain their broken code. Did I mention that they failed to mention this change in release notes, that firefox displayed a message inviting people to click a link to learn why their browser suddenly lost the ability to play sound but the link was broken and that this was an ESR release? So when I read some mozilla marketing PR about them pretending to champion user privacy, I'm nonplussed at best.
- j_s 9y agoWhen I said course-correct I didn't mean complete reversal, it's usually been just enough to satiate temporary outrage in early-adopter/tech circles before it goes mainstream. Thanks for taking the time to document the details of this particular situation which I've never heard about before. I wonder how many other mildly upsetting (?? - per "nonplussed at best") decisions are currently accumulating under the radar. Each time another pops up I'm amazed at how much Mozilla has successfully swept under the rug. The two I knew of are including Paper by default for some time (after taking heat for this, then acquiring it a year later... though I didn't see it when I just checked) and sticking with opt-_out_ for Google Analytics on the add-ins page. After digging recently thanks to the Mr. Robot stuff I discovered the opt-out Cliqz add-on for Germany and now your anecdote.