> Apparently I failed; you guys win. Rust programs are invincible by definition. This is not what I'm saying, and you're being deliberately obtuse at this poi

> Apparently I failed; you guys win. Rust programs are invincible by definition. This is not what I'm saying, and you're being deliberately obtuse at this point. > My trust model was the same as that of those who want memory to be zero'd, like the one earlier [1]. This person was asking about network exploits where this has been a problem. Rust helps prevent those exploits. Does it fix the problem completely? Of course not. Does it fix the problem to the point where it's "not worth worrying about"? Depends, depends on where you stop worrying about things, and this is why the original commented addressed both cases. Revisit the first comment and consider if others perhaps interpreted it more broadly than you. I am done discussing this. You're putting words into my mouth, and being deliberately obtuse.