5 ms·
uMatrix is also great. It does a lot of the same things NoScript does, but at a greater granularity. I still use NoScript for its XSS protection features but ha
by acobster 9y ago
uMatrix is also great. It does a lot of the same things NoScript does, but at a greater granularity. I still use NoScript for its XSS protection features but have the main JS-blocking feature disabled because it's redundant.
- notyourday 9y agoInteresting. I never got around to playing with uMatrix. Is it worth it considering i have a boatload of configs for sites i use with NoScript?
- XzetaU8 9y agoYou can convert NoScript configs to uMatrix with [1]uMatrix-Converter. [1]: https://pro-domo.ddns.net/umatrix-converter https://pro-domo.ddns.net/umatrix-converter
- interfixus 9y agoIt is. It does. uMatrix is probably not for the average user out there, but personally, I won't go anywhere on the web without it these days. Keep the blacklists up to date, and have scripting completely off by default. You get granular control on a wholly different levet than offered by NoScript (which I really no longer see a need for).
- youou 9y ago>have scripting completely off by default Does this mean you have the "scripts" column red and turn them on for individual sites?
- interfixus 9y agoThat is what it means, yes. And click them on as needed, first local scripts, and then various external ones if that's not enough. Can be a bit of a hassle for a while, but once you get permanent rulesets established for sites you frequent and more or less trust, it works like a dream. I hardly ever see an ad, and various sniffer-services (or "analytics") must somehow learn to live without a lot my traffic data.
- deltaprotocol 9y agoNot parent but probably yes. That's how I roll as well.