2 ms·
1 - i changed it to equate for you. 2. you did, and your illustration provided no such thing; it’s a strawman with no bearing in reality, and your very self-sa
by Helmet 9y ago
1 - i changed it to equate for you.
2. you did, and your illustration provided no such thing; it’s a strawman with no bearing in reality, and your very self-same argument can be used to undermine your own position...
3. what?
- lurr 9y agoThere was no equivalence drawn between slavery and the (modern) treatment of homosexuals. There was a parallel drawn between the cultural divide on both issues, and the implication was that, like slavery, oppression of homosexuals is wrong. 3. The hatred of homosexuals (at least hatred of gay marriage) tends to draw from religion. A more secular society has no reason to care.