2 ms·
It was supposed to be provocative someone took a hard look at the project and made up irrelevant reasons not to participate in owning the underlying gas of the
by ringaroundthetx 9y ago
It was supposed to be provocative
someone took a hard look at the project and made up irrelevant reasons not to participate in owning the underlying gas of the network, forfeiting a 11,800% profit from $7 after the DAO incident to $830 today, and maintains that opinion while continuing to masquerade them as related!
- frgtpsswrdlame 9y agoNothing about that relates to their investment decisions. If I'm in blackjack holding a 19 and I choose not to hit and the next card comes up a 2, was that a bad investment decision?
- ringaroundthetx 9y agoIn extremely basic hi/low card counting, if you had the information to suggest that most of the high cards had already been played, then yes that was a bad decision not to hit or weigh it more objectively to come to the same conclusion. This is in line with whatever analogy you were going for, and OP, who had information.
- beaconstudios 9y agoyour analogy to card counting is incorrect. You wouldn't hit on 19.