13 ms·
We should talk. I was thinking size of node could == some kind of measure of size/risk/significance. There's lots of things one might want to visualise, so some
by zwischenzug 9y ago
We should talk. I was thinking size of node could == some kind of measure of size/risk/significance. There's lots of things one might want to visualise, so some collaborated standard would be good.
- lostapathy 9y agoSounds good. I'm not in a position where I can spend a ton of time working on it, but I'm definitely game to be a sounding board for the design. I have the .com for my username, contact info is there.
- DenisM 9y agoDon't forget other modalities. E.g. Size: effort estimate Number of edges to the shape: depth of dependencies. Brightness: size of dependencies. Hue: ...tbd... Border (double/triple/dashed): ...tbd... Font size: ...tbd...
- zwischenzug 9y agoI like it. Another one for part 2.