3 ms·

Scuttlebutt is designed deliberately so that you don't see the whole network, only the bits you care about. Partly this is view-filtering, but also your user a

Scuttlebutt is designed deliberately so that you don't see the whole network, only the bits you care about. Partly this is view-filtering, but also your user agent only requests and stores data if it might be relevant to you, i.e. friends of friends and replies to their messages. It's not really one network, but a group of potentially-overlapping networks.

freeflight 9y ago
> It's not really one network, but a group of potentially-overlapping networks. That might hold true for the technical implementation, but it doesn't hold true for the actual user experience. If you are from the US and looking to befriend somebody from France, then you don't have to join "Facebook.fr" to make that connection, it all works through Facebook.com. Not too long ago the same process looked pretty much like this: "Are you on AIM?" "No, are you on ICQ?" "Nah, but I'm on MSM!" "Sorry I'm not on MSM, but I'm on Linkedin!" "No good for me I don't like Linkedin!" "Guess I'm gonna make an MSM account -_-" For that very same reason I ended up creating my first Facebook account on Facebook.de, which was a scam site back then. But decades of compartmentalization of users into "regions" convinced me that if I want to get any use out of Facebook I better sign up with their German version of the site, as most of my friends/family are German, that's how alien this whole "aggregate all your social contacts in one place" idea was back then.
- gregknicholson 9y ago
  > > It's not really one network, but a group of potentially-overlapping networks. > That might hold true for the technical implementation, but it doesn't hold true for the actual user experience. Talking about Scuttlebutt here, it's actually the other way round. It's one protocol and any two people on it could connect, but in practice you won't see everyone, because you only have a social connection to certain people.

freeflight 9y ago

> It's not really one network, but a group of potentially-overlapping networks. That might hold true for the technical implementation, but it doesn't hold true for the actual user experience. If you are from the US and looking to befriend somebody from France, then you don't have to join "Facebook.fr" to make that connection, it all works through Facebook.com. Not too long ago the same process looked pretty much like this: "Are you on AIM?" "No, are you on ICQ?" "Nah, but I'm on MSM!" "Sorry I'm not on MSM, but I'm on Linkedin!" "No good for me I don't like Linkedin!" "Guess I'm gonna make an MSM account -_-" For that very same reason I ended up creating my first Facebook account on Facebook.de, which was a scam site back then. But decades of compartmentalization of users into "regions" convinced me that if I want to get any use out of Facebook I better sign up with their German version of the site, as most of my friends/family are German, that's how alien this whole "aggregate all your social contacts in one place" idea was back then.

gregknicholson 9y ago
> > It's not really one network, but a group of potentially-overlapping networks. > That might hold true for the technical implementation, but it doesn't hold true for the actual user experience. Talking about Scuttlebutt here, it's actually the other way round. It's one protocol and any two people on it could connect, but in practice you won't see everyone, because you only have a social connection to certain people.